By Hammad Kahlun
International Correspondent,
SNN News Finland
The Nobel Peace Prize Committee’s decision to honor Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado has triggered sharp debate across global political circles.
Critics argue that the move continues a trend of politically motivated awards, overlooking other notable global figures.
Analysts note that the award appears to have strong political undertones, as Machado has long
been a vocal opponent of Venezuela’s current government, which has strained relations with the United States.
Supporters of the Venezuelan leadership view this recognition as a Western attempt to influence the country’s internal politics.
Maria Corina Machado, known for her pro-market economic stance, has stated her intention to
privatize Venezuela’s oil sector and invite foreign particularly U.S. investment.
This has further fueled controversy, with critics questioning whether the Nobel Committee’s choice reflects peace advocacy or political alignment.
The decision has sparked global discussion over whether the
Nobel Peace Prize is drifting from its core principles and
becoming a symbol of political signaling rather than impartial recognition of peace efforts.
About The Author
